ICP- MONROE KELLIEN HYPOTHESIS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

ICP- MONROE KELLIEN HYPOTHESIS - Essay ExampleMonro-kellie hypothesis refers to the relationships between heap and pressure of ICP, blood, cerebral perfusion pressure and brain tissue in the human skull. The hypothesis proposes that, it is not possible to compress the cranial compartment and that there is always a fixed volume of the cranium cavity (Marmarou et al, 1991). The entire constituents of the cranium and the cranium itself keep a volume equilibrium, which responds directly to any transformations in the cranial cavity. An alteration in the volume of a single cranial component resultants to changes in the rest of the cranial components. These activities act as compensation for any changes that might agree the cranial balance. The chief shock absorbers for augmented volumes comprise both blood volume and CSF (Lang & Chesnut, 1995). These shock absorbers react to raises in quantity of the rest of intracranial components. aesculapian conditions like brain trauma raise the le vels of ICP, if ICP goes up it is likely to cause severe brain harm to the brain tissues and cells (Chesnut et al, 1993). Prolonged high levels of ICP can result instantaneous death in adults, but children can withstand such higher pressure for a longer time than the adults without.Severe physical shock in the head can raise the level of ICL can result to cerebral edema and eventually crush the tissue of the brain. Further, such high ICP can slue some vital structures of the brain and hinder the movement of blood to the tissues and brain cells.The vertebral canal and cranium and inelastic dura form a non-flexible container that does not stretch or expand in case of increase of the cranial components. Therefore, any increase in cranial blood will result to a direct rise in ICP. Further, another implication of increase in one of the cranial components is that, such an increase will be accommodated by a subsequent decrease in other cranial constituents (Bahram, 2001). This relationshi p between the cranial